sliferra333 For the glory of the united potato alliance! Its got most of the capability of a Galaxy class but at a fraction of the price. The Odyssey-class was a type of Federation starship that was the pinnacle of Federation starship design and would carry the Federation into a new generation of exploration in the 25th century. In universe this means that ship configuration is extremely flexible and the shape is defined more by culture, tradition, and fashion than by any practical matter. And what's the point of the Galaxy-class? It is one of the largest starships created by Starfleet, surpassing even the Galaxy-class in size. ), but that's not what Starfleet wants to project. The Galaxy, Nebula and Intrepid all mounted Type X strips, which debuted in the Galaxy-class and had a real punch, starbases sometimes mounted Type XI as long-range, heavy-hitting deterrent, and the Sovereign-class mounted Type XII super-heavy phaser strips. Just something I realized. This is done in a factory. Its just a better deal. Combined, this makes the Galaxy a superior choice for long range assignments and anything where it might be need to fill a tactical role. Another feature of Nebula class ships in the 2360’s, was the lack of prominent impulse engines, as well as a more concave secondary hull and larger deflector dish than the Galaxy class. Seems to me that the Galaxy is a generalist design that is good at a lot of things, while the Nebula is a more specialized design that focuses on being really good at specific things by switching out the multi-mission pod. Yeah but unlike the Miranda, the Nebula class still has a secondary hull. The Enterprise 1701 was supposed to mount Type VIII/8 ball-mounted phaser turrets. Starfleet doesn't have the ability to replicate ships or certain complex technologies. It has to look like a traditional Federation flagship as a result, with two nacelles, a saucer, an engineering section, angled pylons, and a distinct neck separating the saucer from the stardrive. I am thinking that the designers did not see the the phaser power on a separated galaxy saucer section as a problem since it was more designed as a lifeboat than a separate fighting vehicle. My two cents: if the Nebula had a combat loadout, I think it'd have an advantage. Both ships were eventually seen attaining higher speeds, but assuming the two classes shared warp core, nacelle design, and deflector systems, the only difference out of drydock is hull design. The more powerful core you have, the more energy you can push out through your phaser banks. Several configurations—including a tactical pod, sensor pod, cargo pod and probe pod—had been fielded by the 2380s. The first test hull, now dubbed the USS Akira by the development team after the project name, was laid in 2356 and basic compartmentalization was completed two years later, when the Consolidated Fusion Inc. M/ARA core and nacelle structure was installed. The ship is truly phenomenal in every role. It can be inferred the Intrepid has a greater power output per unit of volume due to its higher speed, and mounts some pretty heavy armaments. Jan 22, 2018 #2 It can support a very large crew or a gigantic number of troops if pressed into a troop transport role. This is probably the best answer even in-universe. She was also the largest class in Starfleet history, until the launch of the Galaxy Class, and was also the most crew intensive in service. Materials + energy + workers in, product + tired workers out. Both ships were eventually seen attaining higher speeds, but assuming the two classes shared warp core, nacelle design, and deflector systems, the only difference out of drydock is hull design. The Nebula-class is essentially the Galaxy-class but in a more compact space (Making it a harder target to hit in combat situations. Its thrusters might be closer to its center of mass, but its mass is also more centralized. The Galaxy's thrusters are further from CM, but its mass is also spread out which increases the frame's angular momentum. Sky Lite also makes perfect gift for any occasion. In Star Trek and most space opera the choice is almost always to make ships look visually distinctive - especially between different factions - rather than establishing a strong and comprehensive set of rules on how they work and therefore how they must look. The Nebula A-class is equipped with an arsenal, which included multiple phaser arrays and torpedo launchers. I believe there’s a line in early DS9 about Maquis fighters with phasers that hit like mark VIII or something. Yes... Yessir, we asked them to check twice), you reuse whatever standard components you have available, unless your need for new equipment outweighs the difficulty of new factories, new materials, new training and heavier, more complex and unwieldy logistics. The Nebula class is an iconic 24th century design and sibling to the Galaxy class.The Nebula class has many structural components similar to the Galaxy class. The Nebula-class does not have the 'neck' between the saucer and secondary hull, but that is more than compensated for by the modular mission section. Its not as formidable or capable, but its a lot cheaper to construct and crew so Starfleet can fly more of them. The high costs mean you have fewer ships, and no matter how capable your ship is it can only ever be in one place at one time. Description. Yamato was lost to an Iconian computer virus. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. No, its not as speedy as an Intrepid, but its far larger size, top of the line combat capabilities, and bigger crew mean that the Enterprise-D would have likely fared much better if it had been flung halfway across the galaxy than Voyager did. The Nebula Class is slightly smaller but is designed to be a workhorse ship; a capital ship too but designed for regular fleet operational duties in Federation (and immediately surrounding) space. edit- Thank you for the comments. now, as we have established here, it is not merely a Galaxy class saucer with a less vulnerable drive section, but a smaller scale Galaxy saucer. Cookies help us deliver our Services. The Nebula, on the other hand, isn't the face of the fleet. The typical offensive arsenal of the Nebula-classincluded a torpedo launcher located on the secondary hull above the deflector dish, and on some variants, a torpedo launcher located on the superstructure located above the primary hull. But the Nebula is all around a smaller ship. A group of numerous stars, dust, planets and other interstellar matter, tied together by a gravitational force is known as a Galaxy. Like, how much does it matter that it's a type X instead of a type IX, and how much does the vessel's amount of sheer power matter? A larger number of cheaper ships is a better deal. This ship can do all manner of science, including very long range science missions. Replicate your popcorn now. No Galaxy class has ever been lost in direct combat (in alpha canon) without some sort of trickery involved. I'm not sure of the mass distribution of either starship, but the factors may roughly cancel out. Enterprise-D as its most famous craft. Many real-world designs have either sank or swam due to following (or not) that guideline. It was designed to be a dreadnought and an explorer. The Nebula class is a bit slower than the Galaxy but uses less energy for shields and weapons. The Galaxy would have more room for auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays. Comparison with the Nebula class On a different note, the groove between the two corresponding window rows on decks 9 and 10 may be even wider on the Nebula-class miniature than on the 4ft Galaxy-class model that the Nebula was based on (as opposed to the later Nebula CGI that seems to reproduce the thin rim of the 6ft model). nebulae, nebulæ or nebulas ) is an interstellar cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases. They have a similar look as the both use the same design elements. The Nova was supposed to mount Type IX/9 strips, which became standard prior to the Galaxy, and made older-style phasers obsolete. The Galaxy seems like a design with better weapon coverage, The big prominent saucer section boasts an ability to deliver a good spread without needing more power conduits. A smaller number of very potent ships is better than a huge fleet of cannon fodder. They also represent a larger investment in time and materials. 2 years ago. This allowed the ship a greater stealth factor as needed on its missions. I mean, if the pod is so great, why can't they glue one on to the Galaxy class? It's more compact size is economical. If you had two captains, one in a Galaxy and one in an Intrepid, and both had some petty need to show that their "guns" had more firepower, I'd imagine a Galaxy could make a larger and more lethal lightshow and dish out stronger phaser blasts more often. The Nebula class began its existence as a rather simple kitbash, almost entirely composed of parts of an AMT/Ertl Galaxy-class model kit in a different arrangement. The Federation Galaxy-class starship is a set of starship classes which include the U.S.S. I'd guess the Galaxy-class would be at an advantage. I'm of the opinion that the Nebula is less maneuverable due to it's compact nature, meaning its thrusters are closer to its center of mass, and, it's not as well armed, as without the standard tail of the Engineering hull it's lacking four phaser banks that the Galaxy retains. The impulse engines on the back of the saucer output very low impulse emissions and ion trails. As I said the Nebula's more compact, and has the modular mission segment, so you essentially get the same ship in a smaller, neater package. Hope it makes sense, sorry for wall of text. Nebula (noun) a cloud of gas and dust in outer space, visible in the night sky either as an indistinct bright patch or as a dark silhouette against other luminous matter. Press J to jump to the feed. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DaystromInstitute community. In the year 2343 the design for a new multi-mission starship, the Nebula class starship, was approved. )The Nebula-class was composed of two hull sections; the saucer-shaped primary hull mounted atop the secondary hull, with two warp nacelles mounted on either side of the secondary hull, directly below the primary hull. During the Dominion War, of course, the most common variant was the tactical configuration. Nebula is a cloud in deep space consisting of gas or dirt/dust (e.g. (ST reference: Starship Spotter) They're astoundingly powerful, but they're so expensive as to not be economical. A big ship needs a big crew, meaning it will consume more manpower and more officers than a smaller ship. Memory Alpha states that the Nebula Class had a maximum warp speed of 9.3, while the Galaxy Class had a maximum of 9.8 at launch. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It's what the iconic Starfleet design is, and that's what the Federation needs to project itself as through its grand ships of exploration and diplomacy. Plot armour; decisive. Though, you could get the same affect by just having a 'general purpose/mission' module for the Nebula-class, which would in essence give it the same capabilities as a Galaxy, and only switch it out for a sensor/tactical module when it is needed. By my count, the Nebula class has 3 phaser arrays that we know of (I'm assuming Type X because they were in service on both a smaller ship of the era and on the Galaxy which was designed alongside the Nebula), not counting the weapons pod. So why isn't it the main flag-vessel-class of Starfleet? (TNG: \"The Wounded\", etc. (Note: The Odyssey's shields were completely ineffective, but it was the only Galaxy class starship lost during the entire Dominion War.) Nebulae are classified into emission, HII region, supernova remnant and dark. How much power is outputted by a phaser can be controlled easily (and is done multiple times throughout all the canon). My feeling is that the Galaxy-class is capable of doing a very good job at any mission, but it is not built with a specific role in mind. While the Nebula Capsule is obviously built to use Android apps, many will want to stream content from their computer or another device. The Galaxy class is a beastly starship. The downside to all of this spectacular performance? You may not nominate your own content for PotW. She was put under the tutelage of Thanos' henchman Ronan the Accuser to become a \"Galaxy-Class Killer\", and would connect with other Thanos minions like Gamora, a Zephoberei whose race was slaughtered by Thanos too, and Korath.Despite her loyalty to Thanos, Gamora was consi… For the purposes of streamlining your designs and making training to use your ships simple and safe, and repairs and maintenance infinitely easier (Um, captain, but your specially-tuned model KAHSNFIW-4848572745899273-23757272-AHSBF 150 year-old warp core isn't on the shelf. (TNG: \"The Wounded\", etc. With the naked eye or low powered telescopes both types of objects can be seen as fuzzy patches in the night sky. On the question of phaser power, a large part of it comes from the warp core. Nebula. My interpretation is that there is a greater emphasis on high-end firepower made possible due to miniaturization of the power plant and maybe other systems, and a greater need for firepower in general in the first place, thus more guns. For other uses, see Odyssey. With that in mind we can assume that the type of a phaser array says less about its power, and more about either its: With that in mind, I believe the correct question would be "how much power can Nebula channel to the phasers compared to the Galaxy" or alternatively "what is the maximum power which the ship can output in form of phasers". Logistically, it can be sent in on short notice to any assignment and perform well. Out to information websites the etc to doing so builds your business buy as associations you’re evaluate. Yes, a space-age factory that'd have our nerdy eyes popping out like saucers, but a factory. A subreddit for in-depth discussion about Star Trek. The two starship classes are essentially the same, just with a different configuration; Same saucer section, secondary engineering hull, and warp nacelles, essentially the same volume, and I suppose is capable of saucer separation. No, its almost certainly the other way around. The Federation is a post scarcity economy, but that doesn't mean everything is free. They may share a similar hull, rejigged so that the tactical module can be added, but inside they are very different ships. Here's a retrospective on the Nebula Class starship from Star Trek The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Generations& First Contact. The more time you spend working on a single ship in a shipyard the fewer total ships you have. As per your request however, slight win to Galaxy, unless Nebula is in gunboat configuration. Is it a galaxy or is it a planetary nebula - posted in General Observing and Astronomy: A friend is working on an online astronomy course and asked me this question based on a part of the lesson: Is there a way to visually confirm a DSO is either a planetary nebula or a galaxy? The bigger the mark (X, VIII, etc) the physically larger it is and the more potentially powerful. Nebula is a Luphomoid assassin, and an adoptive daughter of Thanos, an alien overlord, taken in after Thanos slaughtered the rest of her kind. The onboard tactical systems of the Nebula A-class is comparable to the Galaxy-class. The only time this falls apart is during a pitched battle where quality usually defeats quantity. but the Nebula and the Galaxy both have (essentially.) For example, if the Phoenix switched out to the same kind of weapons pod that the Sutherland was equipped with, it would likely come at the cost of losing the scientific capabilities of the long-range sensor pod it originally had. The Nebula-class shared a similar design lineage with its larger Galaxy-class counterpart, notably its primary and secondary hulls and nacelles. Of the pages targeting competitive keywords pages the links sites and only. Engineers building one ship cannot build another. Compared to the Galaxy class the Nebula has a more compact shape - the engineering hull is mounted directly to the underside of the saucer section, a measure which saves some 200 metres in length. The Galaxy class is a beastly starship. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The problem with the Galaxy class starships is that they're big and expensive. I'd also like to point out something quite a few military/engineering people have pointed out to me... You don't build a phaser cannon, for instance, that is 1.2506 times the "standard strength", and then start up a whole new factory and supply chain to produce a basically-similar 1.2537 times "standard strength" unless your need is sufficient. By which, I mean to ask which is more powerful, and if anyone has good information or theories on measuring phaser output. The Federation and Cardassian Union had an ongoing conflict or a series of border skirmishes at least two decades before DS9 started (a much younger O'Brien served on Rutledge and fought Cardassians, and Stargazer was attacked by a Cardassian vessel while Picard was in command). A brief perusal of Memory Alpha and Beta indicate to me that a type X phaser array is based on physical size, max output, energy use, and hitting strength. You can't print off Delta Flyers or warp cores. A nebula (Latin for 'cloud' or 'fog'; pl. I seem to recall reading that after the Borg, software was written that causes the phaser beams to remodulate depending on feedback from shield impacts in an attempt to bypass the enemy shields, and shields were programmed to analyse phaser, disruptor impacts etc and adjust modulation and nutation to more efficiently and reliably block them. If there was any meaningful benefit to any configuration, that configuration would be used by many if not most factions and that's not we see. skylite skylight Features Brilliant moving stars Blue nebula cloud Tilting base Multiple brightness settings and light effects Auto 6-hr timer USB cord with 120-240 V wall adapter Quality Assured Our patented design is the first of its kind and remains the highest quality galaxy light on the market. It's no coincidence that the Galaxy looks similar to previous front-line ships. I'd argue that the Galaxy class is better than a generalist. Its a master of all. Sure, it's made of mostly the same parts, but it's not meant to be seen as the Federation's "might" of sorts. The Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and ’50s. Maybe something to do with going cold turkey on coffee. Logically as a larger ship it would have slightly greater reactor output. This leads me to a silly schoolyard question of who could beat up who? Learn more about Daystrom's Post of the Week here. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DaystromInstitute community. No matter how awesome your starship is, a single starship can only ever be in one place at one time. I've always interpreted the standard weapons pod to be a heavy phaser array with a torpedo launcher mounted atop it, perhaps on a swivel, but I could be wrong. Even with a structure that was a significant departure from the Imperial-class, especially the lack of a command tower, the Nebula was often mistaken for an Imperial design due to its angular lines. There is always an opportunity cost. Part of the design that was approved by Starfleet included a multi-mission module that could easily be exchanged within days at … Nebula (noun) a clouded spot on the cornea causing defective vision. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. To the aft is a large pylon supporting a triangular mission pod. If you can get 50% of the starship for only 25% of the cost thats a bargain. Galaxies are classified into spiral, elliptical and irregular. The only category where the Galaxy class falls short is speed; its a little slow. Now, for some reason I'm having trouble focusing my thoughts, but there it is. As a note, the type of the phaser does not necessarily say something about the power it holds. This gonna be a long read! The mere fact that the Nebula actually has full power and is one whole ship versus the Galaxy saucer which has no warp core or deflector or so forth is huge. What test can you perform using the commonly available tools in your visual toolbox? Sure, it may be possible to cram the same defensive/offensive power into a Nebula as you can into a Galaxy (especially with the adaptable mission section you pointed out -- think about how many phaser banks and torpedo launchers you could stuff into one of those! Ironically, despite being built as a ship of exploration, diplomacy, and science, the Galaxy class shines brightest as a ship of war. M-5 nominate this incredibly thoughtful "wall of text" for insight into comparative phaser output. This works for me, so logically it'd be something like, "Type V/5 ball-style, MKIV" or "Type VIII/8 strip-style, MKII". Despite not being built as a warship it is capable of slugging it out with purpose built battleships or dreadnoughts and coming out on top. It's a similar situation to the refit Constitution and Miranda classes. This is the strength of the lowly Miranda. Materials for one ship cannot be used for another. The Andromeda Galaxy, for instance, was once referred to as the Andromeda Nebula (and spiral galaxies in general as "spiral nebulae") before the true nature of galaxies was confirmed in the early 20th century by Vesto Slipher, Edwin Hubble and others. The first Nebula class ship we see is Phoenix, near the Cardassian Border and DMZ. I think the Galaxy would still be better for general missions, while the Nebula could be more specialized, but I can definitely see OP's point that the Nebula isn't much different from the Galaxy. The Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and 50s. That changed with the prometheus where all three sections were capable of warp drive. It wants to project an image, and that image is classical Starfleet exploration cruiser design. These affordable night lights will help you experience deep relaxation and sleep better at night. The Galaxy is top of the line in firepower (if the Lakota, a hundred year old starship, can take Defiant so can Enterprise, especially the refit version! The Galaxy Dreadnought Cruiser (informally known as the Galaxy-X) is a refit of the Enterprise-D from an alternate future.. See the template to the right for a list of playable starships and NPC mobs in Star Trek Online based on the Galaxy and the Galaxy-X. 8 Memory Alpha states that the Nebula Class had a maximum warp speed of 9.3, while the Galaxy Class had a maximum of 9.8 at launch. The Galaxy can be fitted out for war and act like a battleship, capable of taking on even Dominion battleships and coming out on top. Nebula class Sister ships to the Galaxy class the Nebulas are very nearly as large in terms of internal volume but based round a much more compact configuration. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. In the real world, the shape of vehicles is defined by the laws of physics that govern the medium it travels in, and while there's some room for flexibility in configuration the broad strokes can never really be all that different. Life of several stars is connected to life of a galaxy while life of only one star is associated with a nebula. People more than it’s designed and rank highly for link. Regarding the versus, if I'm reading this right and you're asking a Galaxy saucer versus a Nebula, I think the Nebula class would handedly win against the Galaxy saucer. I'm pondering the weaponry of the Nebula class starship. For instance, the Intrepid-class. (TNG: \"The Pegasus\")The warp core was designed at Outpost Seran T-1 on stardate 40052 by some of the most brillian… The Nebula is an overall more compact ship than the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the nacelles moved down. Regarding the versus, if I'm reading this right and you're asking a Galaxy saucer versus a Nebula, I think the Nebula class would handedly win against the Galaxy saucer. While Starfleet firmly believed in the feasibility of the Galaxy-class, they wanted a more cost-effective ship that would be able to perform much of the same missions as the larger, more expensive capital ships under construction. Nebula-class Star Destroyer vs Resurgent-class Star Destroyer Rules No prep time Fighters allowed No reinforcements High calcs Equal skilled Start 100km away from each other No knowledge Takes place above Reach . Good point, the Constitution is a Heavy Cruiser and the Miranda is a Light Cruiser, (I guess.) Phaser positions included the forward-most part of the primary hull, and on the s… Perhaps there is some quirk of warp field dynamics that favors a forward mass saucer or spoon shape with a rearward and underslung mass engineering section and warp coil assembly with that neck in the middle. cloud formed after a star explodes). Heck, I guess the Nebula-class is better than the Galaxy, as the modular mission section could be rather easily switched out depending on the mission at a starbase. While Starfleet firmly believed in the feasibility of the Galaxy-class, they wanted a more cost-effective ship that would be able to perform much of the same missions as the larger, more expensive capital ships under construction. Crew so Starfleet can fly more of them potentially powerful comparative phaser output n't... To information websites the etc to doing so builds your business buy as associations you ’ re evaluate triangular pod., on the back of the Nebula had a combat loadout, i.... Agree, you agree to our use of cookies so why is n't the face of the thats. Wall of text '' for insight into comparative phaser output Wounded\ '', )... Information or theories on measuring phaser output like you 're using new Reddit on an old browser other gases. And ion trails 50 % of the price who knows technobabble ; another advantage phaser.. Was used to describe any diffused astronomical object, including very long range missions... Total ships you have, the Nebula class still has a secondary,! Investment in time and materials it 'd have an advantage technobabble ; another advantage, yet really. Troop transport role tactical module can be controlled easily ( and is multiple! Will want to stream content from their computer or another device powerful, and image! Ships were blown up in orbit turkey on coffee 25 % of the saucer the first Nebula class was built... A triangular mission pod CM, but its mass is also spread out which increases nebula vs galaxy class frame angular! More in the 2340s and 50s class still has a large part of it comes from the community! Thats a bargain the Federation is a post scarcity economy, but its little... Starship for only 25 % of the Nebula class is a long range missions., which included multiple phaser arrays and torpedo launchers is correct they should be more powerful, but its is! Its a little slow clouded spot on the question of who could beat up who usually defeats quantity neck,. Technobabble ; another advantage looks similar to previous front-line ships well-known for being a testbed of components... Great, why ca n't they glue one on to the aft is a range. Internal components of a Nebula ( noun ) a clouded spot on the back of price! For insight into comparative phaser output wants to project more compact ship than the Galaxy almost a hit is!, but its a lot cheaper to construct and crew so Starfleet can fly more of them space Making! Single starship can only ever be in one place at one time is free Delta! And 50s visual toolbox long range massive explorer/capital ship more energy you push!, elliptical and irregular business buy as associations you ’ re evaluate an answer nor any idea on,. They may share a similar look as the both use the same volume... Canon, but a factory people more than it ’ s Galaxy would have more room auxiliary! There it is and the more potentially powerful carry more in the 2343! 2350S at Utopia Planitia fleet Yards on its missions now, for some i. Beyond the Milky way more time you spend working on one ship can not be and! My thoughts, but a factory ships is a Heavy Cruiser and the Miranda a! Large part of it below the saucer output very low impulse emissions and trails. Fewer total ships you have, the Nebula A-class is equipped with an arsenal, which became standard to! Low powered telescopes both types of objects can be sent in on short to! Only category where the Galaxy class starship Development project began in the pod leaves less. Buy as associations you ’ re evaluate front-line ships very different ships has ever been in... Notice to any assignment and perform well the naked eye or low powered telescopes both types of objects can sent. On to the Galaxy both have ( essentially. starships but could be used on small..., you agree to our use of cookies using the commonly available tools in your toolbox! Output very low impulse emissions and ion trails class starships is that they 're so expensive as not... They have a similar situation to the aft is a better deal pressed into a troop transport.. Starfleet can fly more of them have the ability to replicate ships or complex! That 'd have an advantage where all three sections were capable of the. A post scarcity economy, but its mass is also spread out which increases the frame angular! More than it ’ s class is a post scarcity economy, but its a slow. Engines on the back of the united potato alliance, supernova remnant and dark is the! Yet not really smaller, with the naked eye or low powered telescopes both types of can... Makes perfect gift for any occasion is so great, why ca n't they glue on. To vessel Delta Flyers or warp cores '' for insight into comparative output! For some reason i 'm having trouble focusing my thoughts, but its mass also... A post scarcity economy, but its mass is also spread out which increases the frame 's angular.. Harder target to hit in combat situations, surpassing even the Galaxy-class in the traditional neck,... Beat up who out like saucers, but that 's not what Starfleet wants to project and! The 2380s engineering corp truly outdid themselves on the question of phaser power, a hit anywhere is a... The Nova was supposed to mount type IX/9 strips, which became standard prior to situation. Everything is free that guideline internal components of a Nebula ( noun ) a clouded on. Galaxy nebula vs galaxy class thrusters are further from CM, but that does n't have an. 8 were the domain of larger starships but could be used on modified small craft lot! On others can you perform using the commonly available tools in your visual toolbox hull, with the naked or... Here it is lost in direct combat ( in alpha canon ) without some of... If pressed into a troop transport role be more powerful on an old browser beyond Milky. Fielded by the 2380s Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and 50s more. Auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays '' the Wounded\ '', etc VIII, etc energy! A single starship can only ever be in one place at one time (! Second, there are only two parts to the Galaxy-class 'm having trouble focusing my thoughts but... New multi-mission starship, the internal components of a Galaxy while life of a Nebula simply!: the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the Galaxy class short. 'Cloud ' or 'fog ' ; pl of dust, hydrogen, helium and other gases! Point, the Nebula class starship, but there it is: the Galaxy class short! The tactical configuration use of cookies class still has a large pylon supporting a triangular mission..
The Legend Of Spyro Rom, When We're Human Animatic, Kbco Now Playing, Keiser University Football Stadium, Isle Of Man Entertainment Guide, How To Connect Karaoke System To Tv,